Adidas is the lighter bet on entry — ₹70 L vs ₹80 L (about ₹10 lakh less). Adidas runs the bigger network at 150 vs 60 outlets. Asics takes less off the top (0% royalty vs 5%).
Numbers that separate them on a 5-year horizon — not the dealer-pitch summary.
On pure entry capital, Adidas is 1.1× cheaper than Asics — ₹70 L vs ₹80 L. That gap compounds over a 5-year horizon because working capital and rent deposit scale with format size.
Royalty structures diverge sharply: Asics charges 0% while Adidas takes 5% of revenue. On ₹50L annual turnover that's ₹250000 per year flowing out of your P&L, every year, for the lifetime of the agreement.
Primary (flagship) format per brand. Smaller kiosk / express formats may have different economics.
Primary (flagship) franchise format per brand. Some brands also offer smaller kiosk / cloud-kitchen formats at lower capex — check the brand page for full format options.
Bigger networks mean more brand recognition and supplier scale; smaller ones mean less intra-brand competition in your territory.
Which brand's outlets are rated higher by customers, aggregated across locations. Exact star rating and review volume are in Brand Health.
Direction only — the underlying rating & review count are Pro data.
Every verified data point. Green badge marks the more favourable value for a typical first-time operator.
| Metric | Adidas | Asics |
|---|---|---|
| Entry capex | ₹70 L ↓ Lower | ₹80 L |
| Royalty | 5% | 0% ↓ Lower |
| Gross marginExact margin % + full unit economicsFood-cost, royalty drag and the monthly P&L behind "Higher".Unlock with Pro → | Lower | Higher |
| Min space (sqft) | 1000 | 1000 |
| Total outlets | 150 ↑ Bigger | 60 |
| Franchise fee | ₹4 L ↓ Lower | ₹7 L |
| Working capital | ₹60 L | ₹25 L |
BrandFit asks 6 visual questions about your operator profile, capital, and location — then ranks all 240 brands by predicted success-fit for your situation. See where these brands really stand for someone like you.
Open this pair plus Puma and Reebok (the next-largest Sports & Athleisure brands by network size) side-by-side in the full comparison tool. Add or swap brands to fit your decision.
Same data plus galleries, store-locator, margin economics, legal vault — free on every brand page.
Visitors researching this pair often look at these.
Wrapped in FAQPage JSON-LD for SERP rich-result eligibility.
Beyond the advertised capex, factor in: refundable security deposit (₹1–5L), rent deposit (1–6 months of rent), working capital for inventory and salaries (typically ₹5–20L for first 3 months), signage and interior fit-out (often 25–40% of total setup), and ongoing royalty or supply-chain margins. FRANticc separates "at-risk capital" from "refundable capital" on every brand page so you see the real exposure.
Multi-unit ownership is common in Indian franchising and several Sports & Athleisure brands actively encourage it through discounted second/third-unit fees. Check for "master franchise" or "multi-unit development" terms in the contract — these usually require a minimum 3–5 unit commitment within a defined city/region over 24–36 months.
FRANticc's database lists 2 brands matching this comparison with verified investment data, store counts, and format details. Several more are covered across our full directory. Every data point cites its public source.
There's no universal winner. Adidas suits operators who value lower entry capex and faster capital recovery. Asics suits operators who have the capital for a premium launch and prefer established scale. Your location's traffic profile, your available capital, and your operating style together determine the right answer.