Popeyes is 1.8× cheaper to get into — $1.2M vs $2.2M (about $1M less). Burger King runs the bigger network at 5518 vs 3134 outlets. Burger King takes less off the top (4.5% royalty vs 5%).
Numbers that separate them on a 5-year horizon — not the franchise-development pitch.
On pure entry capital, Popeyes is 1.8× cheaper than Burger King — $1.2M vs $2.2M. That gap compounds over a 5-year horizon because build-out, equipment, opening inventory and the additional funds in FDD Item 7 all scale with format size.
Burger King has 1.8× more outlets than Popeyes (5518 vs 3134) — more brand recognition and supplier scale, but also denser intra-brand competition in saturated markets.
Burger King is expanding fastest here — 77 outlets per year since founding in 1954. High-velocity brands signal momentum but also mean new territory for individual franchisees gets handed out quickly; lock in your preferred area early.
Primary format per brand, from FDD Item 7. A brand's smaller express or non-traditional formats can cost materially less.
Total initial investment, low end of each brand's FDD Item 7 range for its primary format. Several US brands also run smaller express, non-traditional or conversion formats at materially lower investment — check the brand page for the full Item 7 table.
Total US outlets from FDD Item 20. Bigger networks mean more brand recognition and supplier scale; smaller ones mean less intra-brand competition in your trade area.
Which brand's outlets are rated higher by customers, aggregated across locations. Exact star rating and review volume are in Brand Health.
Direction only — the underlying rating & review count are Pro data.
Straight from each brand’s FDD. Green badge marks the more favourable value for a typical first-time operator.
| Metric | Burger King | Popeyes |
|---|---|---|
| Initial investment (Item 7) | $2.2M | $1.2M ↓ Lower |
| Royalty (Item 6) | 4.5% ↓ Lower | 5% |
| Gross margin | — | — |
| Min space (sq ft) | 2500 | 1600 ↓ Smaller |
| Total US outlets (Item 20) | 5518 ↑ Bigger | 3134 |
| Franchise fee (Item 5) | $50K | $50K |
| Additional funds | — | — |
BrandFit asks 6 visual questions about your operator profile, capital, and location — then ranks all 182 brands by predicted success-fit for your situation. See where these brands really stand for someone like you.
FRANticc is independent — not the franchisor, and paid nothing by either brand. We send you straight to the brand's own franchise-development team, and we never collect or forward your contact details.
Same data plus the full FDD breakdown, fee load, contract fairness and SBA lending picture — free on every brand page.
Visitors researching this pair often look at these.
Wrapped in FAQPage JSON-LD for SERP rich-result eligibility.
FDD Item 20 lists every outlet by state, plus openings, closures, transfers and terminations for the last three years — the fastest way to see whether a brand is still expanding near you or has gone quiet. Burger King runs the largest network here at 5518 outlets. Note that fourteen states — California, New York, Illinois, Virginia, Washington and others — require franchise registration, so a brand may simply be unregistered in yours.
Contract terms among these brands range from Burger King (No renewal right; option for successor 20-yr agreement (sign then-current version).); Popeyes (20-yr initial term; one 10-yr renewal + optional 10-yr Supplemental Renewal Term). Shorter terms offer renewal leverage but can mean the brand exits a weak market; longer terms lock you in but often include renewal fees. Always clarify renewal terms in writing before signing the initial contract.
There's no universal winner. Burger King suits operators who value brand prestige and larger-format positioning. Popeyes suits operators who want to test the market with smaller initial exposure. Your location's traffic profile, your available capital, and your operating style together determine the right answer.
Payback on a Food & Beverage franchise in the US typically runs 24–48 months, depending on site traffic, build-out cost, and the royalty plus ad-fund load in FDD Item 6. The brands on this page start at $1.2M of initial investment (Item 7); pair that with the brand's Item 19 financial performance representation, where one is published, to model your own payback instead of relying on a franchise-development pitch.