Kumon is the lighter bet on entry — $102K vs $118K (about $16K less). Kumon runs the bigger network at 1705 vs 433 outlets.
Numbers that separate them on a 5-year horizon — not the franchise-development pitch.
The operational model splits the room: Kumon expects high involvement; Sylvan Learning expects medium involvement. If you're an absentee investor this matters as much as the capex — the wrong match burns you via under-managed operations.
On pure entry capital, Kumon is 1.2× cheaper than Sylvan Learning — $102K vs $118K. That gap compounds over a 5-year horizon because build-out, equipment, opening inventory and the additional funds in FDD Item 7 all scale with format size.
Kumon is expanding fastest here — 25 outlets per year since founding in 1958. High-velocity brands signal momentum but also mean new territory for individual franchisees gets handed out quickly; lock in your preferred area early.
Primary format per brand, from FDD Item 7. A brand's smaller express or non-traditional formats can cost materially less.
Total initial investment, low end of each brand's FDD Item 7 range for its primary format. Several US brands also run smaller express, non-traditional or conversion formats at materially lower investment — check the brand page for the full Item 7 table.
Total US outlets from FDD Item 20. Bigger networks mean more brand recognition and supplier scale; smaller ones mean less intra-brand competition in your trade area.
Which brand's outlets are rated higher by customers, aggregated across locations. Exact star rating and review volume are in Brand Health.
Direction only — the underlying rating & review count are Pro data.
Straight from each brand’s FDD. Green badge marks the more favourable value for a typical first-time operator.
| Metric | Kumon | Sylvan Learning |
|---|---|---|
| Initial investment (Item 7) | $102K ↓ Lower | $118K |
| Royalty (Item 6) | — | 11% |
| Gross margin | — | — |
| Min space (sq ft) | 1000 | 1000 |
| Total US outlets (Item 20) | 1705 ↑ Bigger | 433 |
| Franchise fee (Item 5) | $2K ↓ Lower | $47K |
| Additional funds | — | — |
BrandFit asks 6 visual questions about your operator profile, capital, and location — then ranks all 182 brands by predicted success-fit for your situation. See where these brands really stand for someone like you.
FRANticc is independent — not the franchisor, and paid nothing by either brand. We send you straight to the brand's own franchise-development team, and we never collect or forward your contact details.
Same data plus the full FDD breakdown, fee load, contract fairness and SBA lending picture — free on every brand page.
Visitors researching this pair often look at these.
Wrapped in FAQPage JSON-LD for SERP rich-result eligibility.
Payback on a Education & Training franchise in the US typically runs 24–48 months, depending on site traffic, build-out cost, and the royalty plus ad-fund load in FDD Item 6. The brands on this page start at $102K of initial investment (Item 7); pair that with the brand's Item 19 financial performance representation, where one is published, to model your own payback instead of relying on a franchise-development pitch.
Among the 2 brands FRANticc compares, the top options by network size are Kumon, Sylvan Learning (Kumon: 1705 stores, Sylvan Learning: 433 stores). The lowest investment entry is Kumon from $102K. "Best" depends on your capital, your market and how hands-on you plan to be — this page gives you the data for all three dimensions.
Territory is FDD Item 12, and it is where Education & Training franchisors differ most. Some grant a protected radius or a defined trade area; many grant no exclusivity at all and reserve the right to open company units, non-traditional locations or e-commerce channels inside your area. Read Item 12 word for word — "protected territory" and "exclusive territory" are not the same thing — then ask existing franchisees whether the brand has honoured it.
Yes — multi-unit ownership is the norm in mature US Education & Training systems, and most franchisors sell it as an area development agreement: a fee paid up front for the right to open N units on a fixed schedule inside a defined territory. The terms sit in FDD Items 5 and 12. Miss the development schedule and the franchisor can usually reclaim the territory, so treat the schedule as a covenant, not a target.
For a first-time franchisee, capital preservation matters more than brand prestige. Kumon has the lower entry capex here, which caps downside if the location underperforms. That said, first-time operators should also weigh how much hand-holding the brand provides in site selection, training, and SOP enforcement — not just the sticker price.