AAMCO is 1.6× cheaper to get into — $237K vs $385K (about $149K less). Midas runs the bigger network at 889 vs 540 outlets. AAMCO takes less off the top (7.5% royalty vs 10%).
Numbers that separate them on a 5-year horizon — not the franchise-development pitch.
Midas has 1.6× more outlets than AAMCO (889 vs 540) — more brand recognition and supplier scale, but also denser intra-brand competition in saturated markets.
On pure entry capital, AAMCO is 1.6× cheaper than Midas — $237K vs $385K. That gap compounds over a 5-year horizon because build-out, equipment, opening inventory and the additional funds in FDD Item 7 all scale with format size.
Midas charges 10% royalty on revenue — recurring, uncapped, and deducted before your own margin is calculated. Factor it into every pro-forma.
Primary format per brand, from FDD Item 7. A brand's smaller express or non-traditional formats can cost materially less.
Total initial investment, low end of each brand's FDD Item 7 range for its primary format. Several US brands also run smaller express, non-traditional or conversion formats at materially lower investment — check the brand page for the full Item 7 table.
Total US outlets from FDD Item 20. Bigger networks mean more brand recognition and supplier scale; smaller ones mean less intra-brand competition in your trade area.
Which brand's outlets are rated higher by customers, aggregated across locations. Exact star rating and review volume are in Brand Health.
Direction only — the underlying rating & review count are Pro data.
Straight from each brand’s FDD. Green badge marks the more favourable value for a typical first-time operator.
| Metric | Midas | AAMCO |
|---|---|---|
| Initial investment (Item 7) | $385K | $237K ↓ Lower |
| Royalty (Item 6) | 10% | 7.5% ↓ Lower |
| Gross margin | — | — |
| Min space (sq ft) | 5000 | 3500 ↓ Smaller |
| Total US outlets (Item 20) | 889 ↑ Bigger | 540 |
| Franchise fee (Item 5) | $35K ↓ Lower | $40K |
| Additional funds | — | — |
BrandFit asks 6 visual questions about your operator profile, capital, and location — then ranks all 182 brands by predicted success-fit for your situation. See where these brands really stand for someone like you.
FRANticc is independent — not the franchisor, and paid nothing by either brand. We send you straight to the brand's own franchise-development team, and we never collect or forward your contact details.
Same data plus the full FDD breakdown, fee load, contract fairness and SBA lending picture — free on every brand page.
Visitors researching this pair often look at these.
Wrapped in FAQPage JSON-LD for SERP rich-result eligibility.
Payback on a Automotive franchise in the US typically runs 24–48 months, depending on site traffic, build-out cost, and the royalty plus ad-fund load in FDD Item 6. The brands on this page start at $237K of initial investment (Item 7); pair that with the brand's Item 19 financial performance representation, where one is published, to model your own payback instead of relying on a franchise-development pitch.
Territory is FDD Item 12, and it is where Automotive franchisors differ most. Some grant a protected radius or a defined trade area; many grant no exclusivity at all and reserve the right to open company units, non-traditional locations or e-commerce channels inside your area. Read Item 12 word for word — "protected territory" and "exclusive territory" are not the same thing — then ask existing franchisees whether the brand has honoured it.
The lowest-investment option here is AAMCO starting from $237K. Remember this is the LOW end of the brand's FDD Item 7 initial-investment range — Item 7's high end is the number to plan against, and it sits before the working capital you burn until the unit turns over.
FDD Item 7 is the honest list, and it runs well past the headline number: initial franchise fee (Item 5), leasehold improvements and build-out, equipment and signage, opening inventory, insurance, training travel, grand-opening advertising, and three months of additional funds. On top of that sit the recurring Item 6 fees — royalty, national ad fund, technology, and often a local-marketing minimum. FRANticc separates the one-time spend from the recurring load on every brand page so you see the real exposure.
Among the 2 brands FRANticc compares, the top options by network size are Midas, AAMCO (Midas: 889 stores, AAMCO: 540 stores). The lowest investment entry is AAMCO from $237K. "Best" depends on your capital, your market and how hands-on you plan to be — this page gives you the data for all three dimensions.