EXIT Realty is 3.0× cheaper to get into — $61K vs $184K (about $123K less). Keller Williams runs the bigger network at 735 vs 518 outlets.
Numbers that separate them on a 5-year horizon — not the franchise-development pitch.
The operational model splits the room: Keller Williams expects 0 involvement; EXIT Realty expects high involvement. If you're an absentee investor this matters as much as the capex — the wrong match burns you via under-managed operations.
Keller Williams has 1.4× more outlets than EXIT Realty (735 vs 518) — more brand recognition and supplier scale, but also denser intra-brand competition in saturated markets.
On pure entry capital, EXIT Realty is 3.0× cheaper than Keller Williams — $61K vs $184K. That gap compounds over a 5-year horizon because build-out, equipment, opening inventory and the additional funds in FDD Item 7 all scale with format size.
Primary format per brand, from FDD Item 7. A brand's smaller express or non-traditional formats can cost materially less.
Total initial investment, low end of each brand's FDD Item 7 range for its primary format. Several US brands also run smaller express, non-traditional or conversion formats at materially lower investment — check the brand page for the full Item 7 table.
Total US outlets from FDD Item 20. Bigger networks mean more brand recognition and supplier scale; smaller ones mean less intra-brand competition in your trade area.
Which brand's outlets are rated higher by customers, aggregated across locations. Exact star rating and review volume are in Brand Health.
Direction only — the underlying rating & review count are Pro data.
Straight from each brand’s FDD. Green badge marks the more favourable value for a typical first-time operator.
| Metric | Keller Williams | EXIT Realty |
|---|---|---|
| Initial investment (Item 7) | $184K | $61K ↓ Lower |
| Royalty (Item 6) | 6% | — |
| Gross margin | — | — |
| Min space (sq ft) | 2000 | 750 ↓ Smaller |
| Total US outlets (Item 20) | 735 ↑ Bigger | 518 |
| Franchise fee (Item 5) | $35K | $8K ↓ Lower |
| Additional funds | — | — |
BrandFit asks 6 visual questions about your operator profile, capital, and location — then ranks all 182 brands by predicted success-fit for your situation. See where these brands really stand for someone like you.
FRANticc is independent — not the franchisor, and paid nothing by either brand. We send you straight to the brand's own franchise-development team, and we never collect or forward your contact details.
Same data plus the full FDD breakdown, fee load, contract fairness and SBA lending picture — free on every brand page.
Visitors researching this pair often look at these.
Wrapped in FAQPage JSON-LD for SERP rich-result eligibility.
Keller Williams operates the largest network among these — 735 outlets. Large networks offer more brand recognition and supplier scale, but also mean denser intra-brand competition in already-saturated markets.
Payback on a Real Estate Brokerage franchise in the US typically runs 24–48 months, depending on site traffic, build-out cost, and the royalty plus ad-fund load in FDD Item 6. The brands on this page start at $61K of initial investment (Item 7); pair that with the brand's Item 19 financial performance representation, where one is published, to model your own payback instead of relying on a franchise-development pitch.
FDD Item 7 is the honest list, and it runs well past the headline number: initial franchise fee (Item 5), leasehold improvements and build-out, equipment and signage, opening inventory, insurance, training travel, grand-opening advertising, and three months of additional funds. On top of that sit the recurring Item 6 fees — royalty, national ad fund, technology, and often a local-marketing minimum. FRANticc separates the one-time spend from the recurring load on every brand page so you see the real exposure.
Yes — multi-unit ownership is the norm in mature US Real Estate Brokerage systems, and most franchisors sell it as an area development agreement: a fee paid up front for the right to open N units on a fixed schedule inside a defined territory. The terms sit in FDD Items 5 and 12. Miss the development schedule and the franchisor can usually reclaim the territory, so treat the schedule as a covenant, not a target.