Goosehead Insurance is the lighter bet on entry — $66K vs $92K (about $26K less). Goosehead Insurance runs the bigger network at 1008 vs 941 outlets. Chem-Dry takes less off the top (7% royalty vs 20%).
Numbers that separate them on a 5-year horizon — not the franchise-development pitch.
One-time franchise fees are worth noting (FDD Item 5): Goosehead Insurance charges $50K upfront on top of the setup capex. This is a non-refundable sunk cost before revenue begins — bake it into your at-risk capital calculation.
Goosehead Insurance (1008 outlets) and Chem-Dry (941) operate at comparable scale — neither has a decisive network advantage, so your location-specific due diligence matters more than brand size here.
Goosehead Insurance charges 20% royalty on revenue — recurring, uncapped, and deducted before your own margin is calculated. Factor it into every pro-forma.
Primary format per brand, from FDD Item 7. A brand's smaller express or non-traditional formats can cost materially less.
Total initial investment, low end of each brand's FDD Item 7 range for its primary format. Several US brands also run smaller express, non-traditional or conversion formats at materially lower investment — check the brand page for the full Item 7 table.
Total US outlets from FDD Item 20. Bigger networks mean more brand recognition and supplier scale; smaller ones mean less intra-brand competition in your trade area.
Which brand's outlets are rated higher by customers, aggregated across locations. Exact star rating and review volume are in Brand Health.
Direction only — the underlying rating & review count are Pro data.
Straight from each brand’s FDD. Green badge marks the more favourable value for a typical first-time operator.
| Metric | Goosehead Insurance | Chem-Dry |
|---|---|---|
| Initial investment (Item 7) | $66K ↓ Lower | $92K |
| Royalty (Item 6) | 20% | 7% ↓ Lower |
| Gross margin | — | — |
| Min space (sq ft) | 200 | — |
| Total US outlets (Item 20) | 1008 ↑ Bigger | 941 |
| Franchise fee (Item 5) | $50K | $36K ↓ Lower |
| Additional funds | — | — |
BrandFit asks 6 visual questions about your operator profile, capital, and location — then ranks all 182 brands by predicted success-fit for your situation. See where these brands really stand for someone like you.
FRANticc is independent — not the franchisor, and paid nothing by either brand. We send you straight to the brand's own franchise-development team, and we never collect or forward your contact details.
Same data plus the full FDD breakdown, fee load, contract fairness and SBA lending picture — free on every brand page.
Visitors researching this pair often look at these.
Wrapped in FAQPage JSON-LD for SERP rich-result eligibility.
Contract terms among these brands range from Goosehead Insurance (10-yr term · two 10-yr renewals (sign then-current agreement, meet conditions)); Chem-Dry (5-yr term · two 5-yr renewals (sign then-current agreement, may differ materially)). Shorter terms offer renewal leverage but can mean the brand exits a weak market; longer terms lock you in but often include renewal fees. Always clarify renewal terms in writing before signing the initial contract.
Among these brands, the smallest footprint is Goosehead Insurance at 200+ sqft. Square footage is only half the site test — most US franchisors also specify traffic counts, co-tenancy, parking ratios and a trade-area population in the franchise agreement, and will reject a site that hits the minimum footprint but misses those.
Among the 2 brands FRANticc compares, the top options by network size are Goosehead Insurance, Chem-Dry (Goosehead Insurance: 1008 stores, Chem-Dry: 941 stores). The lowest investment entry is Goosehead Insurance from $66K. "Best" depends on your capital, your market and how hands-on you plan to be — this page gives you the data for all three dimensions.
US Services franchisors almost always take a percentage of gross sales, not a share of profit — so the fee is due whether or not the unit is profitable. FDD Item 6 lists the full stack: royalty (commonly 4–8%), a national advertising fund (1–4%), technology fees, and often a local-marketing minimum. Add them together before modelling take-home; the headline royalty is rarely the whole load.