Right at Home is the lighter bet on entry — $94K vs $125K (about $31K less). Right at Home runs the bigger network at 566 vs 541 outlets. Visiting Angels takes less off the top (3.5% royalty vs 5%).
Numbers that separate them on a 5-year horizon — not the franchise-development pitch.
Right at Home charges 5% royalty on revenue — recurring, uncapped, and deducted before your own margin is calculated. Factor it into every pro-forma.
Right at Home (566 outlets) and Visiting Angels (541) operate at comparable scale — neither has a decisive network advantage, so your location-specific due diligence matters more than brand size here.
Primary format per brand, from FDD Item 7. A brand's smaller express or non-traditional formats can cost materially less.
Total initial investment, low end of each brand's FDD Item 7 range for its primary format. Several US brands also run smaller express, non-traditional or conversion formats at materially lower investment — check the brand page for the full Item 7 table.
Total US outlets from FDD Item 20. Bigger networks mean more brand recognition and supplier scale; smaller ones mean less intra-brand competition in your trade area.
Which brand's outlets are rated higher by customers, aggregated across locations. Exact star rating and review volume are in Brand Health.
Direction only — the underlying rating & review count are Pro data.
Straight from each brand’s FDD. Green badge marks the more favourable value for a typical first-time operator.
| Metric | Right at Home | Visiting Angels |
|---|---|---|
| Initial investment (Item 7) | $94K ↓ Lower | $125K |
| Royalty (Item 6) | 5% | 3.5% ↓ Lower |
| Gross margin | — | — |
| Min space (sq ft) | 600 | — |
| Total US outlets (Item 20) | 566 ↑ Bigger | 541 |
| Franchise fee (Item 5) | $50K ↓ Lower | $52K |
| Additional funds | — | — |
BrandFit asks 6 visual questions about your operator profile, capital, and location — then ranks all 182 brands by predicted success-fit for your situation. See where these brands really stand for someone like you.
FRANticc is independent — not the franchisor, and paid nothing by either brand. We send you straight to the brand's own franchise-development team, and we never collect or forward your contact details.
Same data plus the full FDD breakdown, fee load, contract fairness and SBA lending picture — free on every brand page.
Visitors researching this pair often look at these.
Wrapped in FAQPage JSON-LD for SERP rich-result eligibility.
Among the 2 brands FRANticc compares, the top options by network size are Right at Home, Visiting Angels (Right at Home: 566 stores, Visiting Angels: 541 stores). The lowest investment entry is Right at Home from $94K. "Best" depends on your capital, your market and how hands-on you plan to be — this page gives you the data for all three dimensions.
US Home Senior Care franchisors almost always take a percentage of gross sales, not a share of profit — so the fee is due whether or not the unit is profitable. FDD Item 6 lists the full stack: royalty (commonly 4–8%), a national advertising fund (1–4%), technology fees, and often a local-marketing minimum. Add them together before modelling take-home; the headline royalty is rarely the whole load.
There's no universal winner. Right at Home suits operators who value lower entry capex and faster capital recovery. Visiting Angels suits operators who have the capital for a premium launch and prefer established scale. Your location's traffic profile, your available capital, and your operating style together determine the right answer.
Right at Home operates the largest network among these — 566 outlets. Large networks offer more brand recognition and supplier scale, but also mean denser intra-brand competition in already-saturated markets.
FRANticc's database lists 2 brands matching this comparison with verified investment data, store counts, and format details. Several more are covered across our full directory. Every figure is traced to the brand's Franchise Disclosure Document.