Right at Home is the lighter bet on entry — $94K vs $120K (about $25K less). Comfort Keepers runs the bigger network at 619 vs 566 outlets.
Numbers that separate them on a 5-year horizon — not the franchise-development pitch.
On pure entry capital, Right at Home is 1.3× cheaper than Comfort Keepers — $94K vs $120K. That gap compounds over a 5-year horizon because build-out, equipment, opening inventory and the additional funds in FDD Item 7 all scale with format size.
One-time franchise fees are worth noting (FDD Item 5): Comfort Keepers charges $55K upfront on top of the setup capex. This is a non-refundable sunk cost before revenue begins — bake it into your at-risk capital calculation.
Primary format per brand, from FDD Item 7. A brand's smaller express or non-traditional formats can cost materially less.
Total initial investment, low end of each brand's FDD Item 7 range for its primary format. Several US brands also run smaller express, non-traditional or conversion formats at materially lower investment — check the brand page for the full Item 7 table.
Total US outlets from FDD Item 20. Bigger networks mean more brand recognition and supplier scale; smaller ones mean less intra-brand competition in your trade area.
Which brand's outlets are rated higher by customers, aggregated across locations. Exact star rating and review volume are in Brand Health.
Direction only — the underlying rating & review count are Pro data.
Straight from each brand’s FDD. Green badge marks the more favourable value for a typical first-time operator.
| Metric | Comfort Keepers | Right at Home |
|---|---|---|
| Initial investment (Item 7) | $120K | $94K ↓ Lower |
| Royalty (Item 6) | — | 5% |
| Gross margin | — | — |
| Min space (sq ft) | 500 ↓ Smaller | 600 |
| Total US outlets (Item 20) | 619 ↑ Bigger | 566 |
| Franchise fee (Item 5) | $55K | $50K ↓ Lower |
| Additional funds | — | — |
BrandFit asks 6 visual questions about your operator profile, capital, and location — then ranks all 182 brands by predicted success-fit for your situation. See where these brands really stand for someone like you.
FRANticc is independent — not the franchisor, and paid nothing by either brand. We send you straight to the brand's own franchise-development team, and we never collect or forward your contact details.
Same data plus the full FDD breakdown, fee load, contract fairness and SBA lending picture — free on every brand page.
Visitors researching this pair often look at these.
Wrapped in FAQPage JSON-LD for SERP rich-result eligibility.
FRANticc's database lists 2 brands matching this comparison with verified investment data, store counts, and format details. Several more are covered across our full directory. Every figure is traced to the brand's Franchise Disclosure Document.
Among these brands, the smallest footprint is Comfort Keepers at 500+ sqft. Square footage is only half the site test — most US franchisors also specify traffic counts, co-tenancy, parking ratios and a trade-area population in the franchise agreement, and will reject a site that hits the minimum footprint but misses those.
US Home Senior Care franchisors almost always take a percentage of gross sales, not a share of profit — so the fee is due whether or not the unit is profitable. FDD Item 6 lists the full stack: royalty (commonly 4–8%), a national advertising fund (1–4%), technology fees, and often a local-marketing minimum. Add them together before modelling take-home; the headline royalty is rarely the whole load.
Among the 2 brands FRANticc compares, the top options by network size are Comfort Keepers, Right at Home (Comfort Keepers: 619 stores, Right at Home: 566 stores). The lowest investment entry is Right at Home from $94K. "Best" depends on your capital, your market and how hands-on you plan to be — this page gives you the data for all three dimensions.