Best Western is 5.7× cheaper to get into — $881K vs $5M (about $4.2M less). Super 8 runs the bigger network at 1344 vs 16 outlets. Best Western takes less off the top (5% royalty vs 5.5%).
Numbers that separate them on a 5-year horizon — not the franchise-development pitch.
One-time franchise fees are worth noting (FDD Item 5): Super 8 charges $25K upfront on top of the setup capex. This is a non-refundable sunk cost before revenue begins — bake it into your at-risk capital calculation.
The operational model splits the room: Super 8 expects 0 involvement; Best Western expects medium involvement. If you're an absentee investor this matters as much as the capex — the wrong match burns you via under-managed operations.
On pure entry capital, Best Western is 5.7× cheaper than Super 8 — $881K vs $5M. That gap compounds over a 5-year horizon because build-out, equipment, opening inventory and the additional funds in FDD Item 7 all scale with format size.
Primary format per brand, from FDD Item 7. A brand's smaller express or non-traditional formats can cost materially less.
Total initial investment, low end of each brand's FDD Item 7 range for its primary format. Several US brands also run smaller express, non-traditional or conversion formats at materially lower investment — check the brand page for the full Item 7 table.
Total US outlets from FDD Item 20. Bigger networks mean more brand recognition and supplier scale; smaller ones mean less intra-brand competition in your trade area.
Which brand's outlets are rated higher by customers, aggregated across locations. Exact star rating and review volume are in Brand Health.
Direction only — the underlying rating & review count are Pro data.
Straight from each brand’s FDD. Green badge marks the more favourable value for a typical first-time operator.
| Metric | Super 8 | Best Western |
|---|---|---|
| Initial investment (Item 7) | $5M | $881K ↓ Lower |
| Royalty (Item 6) | 5.5% | 5% ↓ Lower |
| Gross margin | — | — |
| Min space (sq ft) | — | — |
| Total US outlets (Item 20) | 1344 ↑ Bigger | 16 |
| Franchise fee (Item 5) | $25K | $25K |
| Additional funds | — | — |
BrandFit asks 6 visual questions about your operator profile, capital, and location — then ranks all 182 brands by predicted success-fit for your situation. See where these brands really stand for someone like you.
FRANticc is independent — not the franchisor, and paid nothing by either brand. We send you straight to the brand's own franchise-development team, and we never collect or forward your contact details.
Same data plus the full FDD breakdown, fee load, contract fairness and SBA lending picture — free on every brand page.
Visitors researching this pair often look at these.
Wrapped in FAQPage JSON-LD for SERP rich-result eligibility.
Among the 2 brands FRANticc compares, the top options by network size are Super 8, Best Western (Super 8: 1344 stores, Best Western: 16 stores). The lowest investment entry is Best Western from $881K. "Best" depends on your capital, your market and how hands-on you plan to be — this page gives you the data for all three dimensions.
Payback on a Tourism & Hospitality franchise in the US typically runs 24–48 months, depending on site traffic, build-out cost, and the royalty plus ad-fund load in FDD Item 6. The brands on this page start at $881K of initial investment (Item 7); pair that with the brand's Item 19 financial performance representation, where one is published, to model your own payback instead of relying on a franchise-development pitch.
FRANticc's database lists 2 brands matching this comparison with verified investment data, store counts, and format details. Several more are covered across our full directory. Every figure is traced to the brand's Franchise Disclosure Document.
US Tourism & Hospitality franchisors almost always take a percentage of gross sales, not a share of profit — so the fee is due whether or not the unit is profitable. FDD Item 6 lists the full stack: royalty (commonly 4–8%), a national advertising fund (1–4%), technology fees, and often a local-marketing minimum. Add them together before modelling take-home; the headline royalty is rarely the whole load.